Amati > Makers Archive > M > Antonio Mariani

Pesaro School

Antonio Mariani

Pesaro, worked 1635–1695

Antonio Mariani was an Italian violin maker active in Pesaro from the mid to late 17th century. His instruments are frequently compared to Brescian and Maggini styles, often featuring double purfling, but are generally characterized by a rough and unsophisticated craftsmanship, including crude inlays, unconventional scrolls, and plain materials. His production is complicated by the conversion of many instruments into 'faux Brescians,' inconsistent identification, and the use of his name on 19th-century factory instruments, with few authentic labels remaining.

Worked Pesaro
Made Cello, Violin

Auction price history

Highest auction price

£25,366
Type Details Sold Price
Violin Bearing the remnants of an imprint of a label Antonio Mariani, Pesaro ... May 2024 £25,366
Violin 35.4 cm (head later) [Attributed to] May 2011 £6,555
Violin 35.7 cm Italy, 1750 c. [Ascribed to] March 2011 £22,500
Violin 35.0 cm Italy, 18th C. [Ascribed to] October 2010 £6,000
Violin 35.3 cm [Attributed to] June 2008 £9,600
Cello 75.6 cm [Attributed to] October 2007 £8,234
Violin 1660 c. June 1990 £14,300
Cello 59.4 cm 1650 c. October 1982 £4,853
Violin 1670 March 1982 £3,667
Violin 1689 June 1980 £6,085

Maker Overview

Life

Antonio Mariani (circa 1635-1695) was a violin maker active in Pesaro, Italy, with his working period generally cited as circa 1635-1695 by John Dilworth in The Brompton’s Book of Violin & Bow Makers, and about 1640 to 1700 by Cecie Stainer in A Dictionary of Violin Makers. Willibald Leo Lütgendorff, in Die Geigen- und Lautenmacher vom Mittelalter bis zur Gegenwart, notes that his period is often assumed to be nearly 100 years too early, refuting claims by Vidal, Valdrighi, and others who placed him around 1570. Lütgendorff suggests that a label date of 1619 might be a misreading of 1649. Dilworth highlights that Mariani's production is somewhat confusing, as many of his instruments have been converted into ‘faux Brescians,’ and others remain unidentified and inconsistent. Furthermore, very few of his instruments retain authentic labels, and the name 'Antonio Mariani' was also utilized for 19th-century factory instruments.

Characteristics

Stylistic Comparisons
Mariani's work is often compared to Brescian instruments, frequently featuring double purfling and decorative purfling designs, though John Dilworth notes no direct connection can be made. Cecie Stainer observes that his work suggests Maggini, albeit in a very rough manner, a sentiment in The Violin, who states Mariani "Worked after the manner of Maggini." Willibald Leo Lütgendorff also points out that his violins are often passed off as works by Gaspar da Salò, despite their double purfling being more reminiscent of Maggini's style.
Decorative Elements
The decorative inlays found on his instruments are described by Dilworth as rather crude and unimaginative.
Scroll Characteristics
Dilworth details that Mariani's scrolls exhibit unconventional flutings and volutes, with the central ridge broadening out to a flat triangular form at the front. Lütgendorff characterizes the scroll as "ziemlich plump" (rather clumsy).
Model and Form
The overall model is considered neat but unsophisticated, featuring narrow corners and similarly small wings to the soundholes.
Material Quality
Materials used were generally very plain. Lütgendorff describes the wood as "unschön und gewöhnlich" (unattractive and common).
F-Holes
Willibald Leo Lütgendorff observes that the F-holes are roughly cut with a knife ("roh mit dem Messer ausgeschnitten").
Varnish
His instruments typically feature a dark oxidised brown varnish, which Dilworth assesses as of good quality but not comparable to contemporary Cremonese or Brescian recipes.
Overall Craftsmanship
Cecie Stainer states his instruments are "not of much value" and "very rough." Lütgendorff describes his work as "recht mittelmässig" (rather mediocre).
Recorded labels
  • Antonius de Marianis
    fecit Pisauri anno 1638John Dilworth
  • Antonius Marianus
    fece in Pesaro Anno 1680John Dilworth
  • Antonio Mariani
    in Pesaro 1673John Dilworth
  • Antonio Mariani
    Pesaro, 1646John Dilworth
  • Antonio Mariani
    fecit anno 1694John Dilworth
Found an error? Report Now

Biographies

The overview above is drawn from the following published accounts. Read them in the original:

John Dilworth+

MARIANI, Antonio Worked circa. 1635-1695 Pesaro Italy. Often compared to Brescian work frequently having double purfling and decorative purfling designs, but no direct connection can be made. The decorative inlays are rather crude and unimaginative. The scrolls having unconventional flutings and volutes. The central ridge broadens out to a flat triangular form at the front of the scroll. The model is neat but unsophisticated, with narrow corners and similarly small wings to the soundholes. Materials generally very plain. Dark oxidised brown varnish, of good quality but not approaching contemporary Cremonese or Brescian recipes. His production is a little confusing since many have been converted into ‘faux Brescians’ and others remain unidentified and inconsistent. Very few retain authentic labels. The name has also been used in 19th century factory instruments. Antonius de Marianis / fecit Pisauri anno 1638 Antonius Marianus / fece in Pesaro Anno 1680 Antonio Mariani / in Pesaro 1673 Antonio Mariani / Pesaro, 1646 Antonio Mariani / fecit anno 1694

George Hart+

Worked after the manner of Maggini.

Cecie Stainer+

A maker in Pesaro about 1640 to 1700. His instruments are not of much value; the work suggests Maggini, but is very rough ; the purfling is generally double.
Labels: “Antonio Mariani Pesaro, 1646,” found in an alto,
and ” Antonio Mariani fecit, anno 1694.”

Willibald Leo Lütgendorff+

Seine Zeit wird gewöhnlich fast um 100 Jahre zu früh angenommen; Vidal, Valdrighi u. A. setzen ihn in das Jahr 1570. Dagegen sprechen sowohl seine Geigen als auch seine Zettel. Wenn auf diesen 1619 zu lesen ist, so scheint diese Zahl aus 1649 entstanden zu sein. Übrigens ist seine Arbeit recht mittelmässig,
das Holz unschön und gewöhnlich; die F-Löcher sind roh mit dem Messer
ausgeschnitten, die Schnecke ziemlich plump. Seine Geigen werden gern für
Arbeiten Gaspar da Salò’s ausgegeben, obwohl sie wegen ihrer doppelten Einlagen
eher an Maggini’s Stil erinnern. Er verwendete verschiedene Zettel.

Sell your instrument with Amati

Get started by uploading photos of your instrument for our experts to review.